Primary tabs

Which of the following poses the most severe threat of using a nuclear weapon?

 

 

View more polls

Comments

Don't forget IRAN

Submitted by Delphis Kaczowski (not verified) : Mar 31, 2016 5:11pm

WE HAVE GIVEN IRAN EVERY REASON TO BELIEVE THAT THEY CAN DO WHATEVER THHEY WANT AND THAT WE WILL NOT DO ANYTHING TO STOP THEM.

Submitted by DAVID BOESCH - ... (not verified) : Mar 31, 2016 5:16pm

I selected ISIS because of their interest in building a dirty bomb and their recent surveillance of nuclear power plants. As for NK I doubt that China would ever let that happen.

Submitted by James Hanley (not verified) : Mar 31, 2016 5:23pm

ISIS, for sure. They have absolutely no respect for life, no mercy and nothing to lose. The same can be said for Kim in North Korea, but between Russia, China and the United States (if Obama, Kerry or any of the other spineless clowns if office grow a set) can keep them in check for a while. Iran ranks second on my list but we must eliminate ISIS immediately and completely.

Submitted by R. Kevin Wierman (not verified) : Mar 31, 2016 6:20pm

US Government in a False Flag Attack!

Submitted by Steve Johan's (not verified) : Mar 31, 2016 6:28pm

I myself think all of the Above.Some of or all your Questions that you post In these E-mails have more than one(1)answer,you know and I know that with all the turmoil and things going on right now in this wourld there is mor than one. However The way Obama is running this country anything is possible.The BORDERS are WIDE OPEN and his Policy's on IMMIGRANTS from SYRIAN refergies.He is a very dangerous Person to the AMERICAN people

Submitted by Manchu 4/9 Infantry (not verified) : Mar 31, 2016 6:48pm

I voted for ISIS. How do you counter-attack if they use a nuclear weapon? They really are not a state. If North Korea were to use nuclear weapons, it's likely that South Korea would end up as an island with a large hole where North Korea previously existed.

Submitted by Robert I Finkel... (not verified) : Mar 31, 2016 7:00pm

Robert, I believe you have underestimated the destructive potential of a nuclear weapon. If a nuclear weapon were detonated in North Korea, both North and South Korea would be devastated. What the initial blast didn't kill, radiation poisoning and atomic fallout would. Then we would have to worry about the radiation and fallout carried on the easterly wind. Eventually, everyone would suffer because of some fanatical Government. It's not worth it.

Submitted by Gerry Wood (not verified) : Mar 31, 2016 9:06pm

Iran is right there among the most possible, but would target Israel, rather than us. They're more likely since the idiot deal our gov't made with them gave them all they need.

Submitted by Dr. Russ Pfahler (not verified) : Mar 31, 2016 8:30pm

N. Korea and ISIS don't possess nuclear weapons, so they are out. Why isn't India on the list? Or Israel? Russia has no reason to nuke anyone and anyone nuking them know they will loose that battle. If Trump is elected the answer is U.S.

Submitted by Pablo Sr. (not verified) : Mar 31, 2016 9:52pm

The 3rd generation nutjob in North Korea is not to be trusted for any reason whatsoever. He is just spoiling for an excuse to fire a ballistic missile at someone, no matter what type of warhead it may have on it. When I was in Korea in 1993-1994, our 1SG big briefing line to welcome people into the country was to say "You are within 35 miles of the guns of the big guy up north" That was when the old man Kim Il Sung was still alive, we are into the second generation since then and things have NOT improved!!!

Submitted by mikedv733 : Apr 1, 2016 12:22pm

Donald Trump, if elected, would present the greatest danger.

Submitted by jim Creagan (not verified) : Apr 1, 2016 1:11pm

Jim, You took the words right out of my mouth.

Submitted by Frank Madia : Apr 1, 2016 6:16pm

Trump is scary!

Submitted by michel whitaker (not verified) : Apr 1, 2016 10:55pm

TROUMP>>>>>>

Submitted by john morgan (not verified) : Apr 3, 2016 9:15pm

Nuclear weapons have been used as a deterrent for years you use one on us we use 10 on you. The end of life as we know it now. If you are crazy enough to put on a vest filled with explosives and detonate it you qualify as one who would not have a problem using a nuclear weapon. Now just look at the countries that have these nut cases that have no problem putting on a vest or could care less if the whole world would suffer a nuclear winter. You don't have to be a nuclear scientist to figure out who would use a nuclear divice.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) : Apr 4, 2016 8:21am