Shop Online at Emblem Sales
Google +LinkedInPinterestYouTubeInstagramTwitterFacebook

Why isn't The American Legion's membership eligibility expanded to all honorably discharged veterans?


Dear Commander James Koutz:

Our Post and Unit has been working on writing another resolution to expand AL membership to all honorably discharged veterans. Through this process, we understand that “Resolutions tell leadership what members want. Resolutions help leadership make decisions.” That quote is from the AL’s guidebook on writing resolutions. We also understand that many before us have written resolutions regarding the expansion to invite all honorably discharged men and women to join the AL. Help us to understand why these resolutions have continually been turned down. What can we do to write a successful resolution before membership numbers drop lower? Thank you for your answer in advance.


Dear Legionnaire;

Please know that all resolutions forwarded to the Resolutions Committee are carefully considered and taken seriously. While all resolutions are not adopted, they are all definitely reviewed and considered in earnest.

The resolution that you discuss is much more complicated than most, as it calls upon The American Legion to change, not only our bylaws, but our charter as well. As you are aware our charter is congressionally mandated, and requesting a change involves more than just the approval of a resolution.

The issue of expanding the membership criterion of The American Legion is an ongoing discussion that the departments and Legion leadership regularly review. There have been many suggestions that include expanding membership to Cold War veterans, expanded Global War On Terror veterans, as well as your department’s suggestion of expanding membership to all veterans.

The commission that handles this is the membership commission and the Internal Affairs Division.

Thank you for contacting the Legislative Division and please remember that we are here to support you, and all of the 2.4 million members of The American Legion.

Louis J. Celli Jr.
Director, National Legislative Division
Washington, D.C.



June 9, 2014 - 4:21pm

As you read, beauty can be incredibly important to your current and future physical appearance and so is understanding all the different techniques and products. This article hopefully took some of the confusion out about beauty, and you'll be able to incorporate some of the ideas into your own approach. The advice here is a great starting place.


June 9, 2014 - 5:01pm

Now that you have read the tips in this article you should feel more confident in your ability to determine what beauty regimin is right for you. These tips were carefully hand selected to help you learn simple basics in beauty and to apply some tried and true tips to your everyday beauty regimen.

M. B. Ingersoll

March 12, 2015 - 9:05am

I've never commented before on TAL's website. But a discussion on LinkedIn lead me to this particular Legislative Q&A article. Then I read the two comments above from "kopetpdzxp." It would appear, from the content, that there is no moderation of the comments as neither of them has anything whatsoever to do with the topic. Now...

Having said that, and admitting to a general ignorance of the legislative/parliamentary procedures of TAL, my thoughts on the topic... It would appear to me that the Resolutions Committee is THE decision making entity for our American Legion. If they control which items go forward, then they have, in fact, the power to decide which issue are allowed to be addressed by the membership. If they do anything more than review the proposed resolution for grammar/spelling and any outright illegal issues, then it appears to me that they are "voting" on whether the issue is heard. If a resolution is vapid, for example, let the greater body simply vote it down. If a resolution presents problems that the leadership considers insurmountable, let them explain that to the membership. If the membership overrides leadership's concerns, and the resolution is passed, that simply provides guidance to the leadership as to how the members wish it to proceed. Nothing is instantaneous.

So... being unmoderated, I presume this won't be read by many, either. Oh well. Vent complete.

Jack Hipp

April 19, 2015 - 5:55pm

M. Ingersoll you are absolutely right. Resolutions are put to Congress at the behest of the resolutions committee. They stop the resolutions - not Congress.
The American Legion is not as democratic as they would like everyone to believe. Why is Lebanon 1982 eligible and not Lebanon 1958. 1958 was awarded an AFEM but 1982 was a Navy/Marine Corps Expeditionary Medal and everyone, in Lebanon or not, is eligible. Can't get an explanation from anyone.

Add new comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Tell us what you think