Primary tabs
Should the United States intervene to prevent further violence in Syria?
Yes. The U.S. can save lives and gain world respect by helping Syria resolve its conflict.
2% (29 votes)
Yes, but only in support of the movement to change the current corrupt regime.
14% (178 votes)
No. This is Syria's problem, and the United States could do more harm than good by getting more involved.
53% (690 votes)
No. The U.S. is in a fiscal crisis and should only devote resources to efforts that directly improve the domestic economy.
31% (400 votes)
Total votes: 1297
Comments
"Yes, but only in support of
"Yes, but only in support of the movement to change the current corrupt regime"???
Are you kidding? Look at our track record in that department. "Change" is NOT equal to "improvement". It may be argued that replacing a square wheel with a triangular one is NOT an improvement, even if there is ONE LESS BUMP!
Charity begins at HOME! Not
Charity begins at HOME! Not in foreign countries and their domestic problems.
If we're the only ones in the
If we're the only ones in the world to care about this, we're crazy to do so. If the rest of the world cares about this, let them do something on their own for a change. If we continue as the world's policeman, why would any other country spend their blood and treasure?