The Automated ScoreBook

Team Statistics


Overall Statistics



The Automated ScoreBook Overall Statistics (as of Aug 06, 2017) (All games Sorted by Batting avg) Team AVG G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI TB SLG% BB HBP SO GDP OB% SF SH SB-ATT PO A E FLD% Henderson, NV....... .395 5 195 66 77 13 2 5 52 109 .559 31 9 21 5 .492 3 7 3-3 135 48 4 .979 League City, TX..... .382 4 131 44 50 16 1 6 42 86 .656 17 5 25 5 .465 2 1 7-8 90 32 10 .924 Chico, CA........... .370 4 165 47 61 15 1 1 39 81 .491 21 6 28 3 .449 4 4 5-5 114 48 10 .942 Grand Junction, CO.. .323 2 65 11 21 5 0 1 10 29 .446 7 0 11 2 .389 0 0 3-3 39 9 8 .857 Albuquerque, NM..... .317 3 101 25 32 6 2 2 25 48 .475 16 4 16 1 .426 1 2 2-2 75 25 7 .935 St. George, UT...... .306 5 206 40 63 9 2 4 37 88 .427 25 2 40 1 .385 1 1 13-18 148 74 9 .961 Tucson, AZ.......... .303 3 109 22 33 8 2 3 20 54 .495 13 1 13 2 .379 1 3 2-3 75 35 4 .965 Eaglecrest, CO...... .250 2 60 8 15 3 1 1 7 23 .383 5 2 17 2 .328 0 0 0-1 46 20 1 .985 Totals.............. .341 1032 352 11 232 .502 29 21 12 35-43 291 .950 28 263 75 23 518 135 171 .427 18 722 53 (All games Sorted by Earned run avg) Team ERA W-L G CG SHO/CBO SV IP H R ER BB SO 2B 3B HR AB B/Avg WP HBP BK SFA SHA Henderson, NV....... 2.60 5-0 5 0 0/0 0 45.0 41 19 13 14 45 6 0 3 169 .243 4 3 0 0 1 St. George, UT...... 5.84 3-2 5 0 0/0 1 49.1 62 42 32 35 17 12 1 2 189 .328 9 7 0 4 10 Albuquerque, NM..... 6.48 1-2 3 1 0/0 0 25.0 37 27 18 14 24 6 2 1 111 .333 7 3 1 2 2 Chico, CA........... 6.87 2-2 4 0 0/0 0 38.0 48 36 29 20 27 5 2 4 157 .306 6 3 0 1 1 Tucson, AZ.......... 7.92 1-2 3 0 0/0 0 25.0 35 23 22 11 22 11 2 1 102 .343 0 3 0 0 1 League City, TX..... 9.60 2-2 4 0 0/0 1 30.0 54 39 32 17 21 15 0 5 146 .370 5 0 1 1 2 Eaglecrest, CO...... 11.74 0-2 2 0 0/0 0 15.1 27 22 20 13 6 8 3 2 70 .386 3 2 0 1 1 Grand Junction, CO.. 30.46 0-2 2 0 0/0 0 13.0 48 55 44 11 9 12 1 5 88 .545 7 8 0 3 0 Totals.............. 7.85 28 0/0 240.2 263 135 75 23 .341 29 12 14-14 1 2 352 210 171 11 1032 41 2 18 PB - TX 3, NM 2. Pickoffs - NV 3, CO-B 2, UT 2, AZ 1, NM 1. (All games Sorted by Fielding pct) Team C PO A E FLD% DPs SBA CSB SBA% PB CI Eaglecrest, CO...... 67 46 20 1 .985 0 1 0 1.000 0 0 Henderson, NV....... 187 135 48 4 .979 2 3 2 .600 0 0 Tucson, AZ.......... 114 75 35 4 .965 4 7 1 .875 0 0 St. George, UT...... 231 148 74 9 .961 8 3 1 .750 0 0 Chico, CA........... 172 114 48 10 .942 5 6 3 .667 0 0 Albuquerque, NM..... 107 75 25 7 .935 0 4 1 .800 2 0 League City, TX..... 132 90 32 10 .924 3 8 0 1.000 3 0 Grand Junction, CO.. 56 39 9 8 .857 2 3 0 1.000 0 0 Totals.............. 1066 291 .950 35 .814 0 722 53 24 8 5

Category Leaders



The Automated ScoreBook Batting Leaders (as of Aug 06, 2017) (All games) Hitting minimums - 1 Games 2.0 AB/Game Pitching minimums - 1 Games 1.0 IP/Game Batting avg ----------- 1. Henderson, NV....... .395 2. League City, TX..... .382 3. Chico, CA........... .370 4. Grand Junction, CO.. .323 5. Albuquerque, NM..... .317 Slugging pct ------------ 1. League City, TX..... .656 2. Henderson, NV....... .559 3. Tucson, AZ.......... .495 4. Chico, CA........... .491 5. Albuquerque, NM..... .475 On base pct ----------- 1. Henderson, NV....... .492 2. League City, TX..... .465 3. Chico, CA........... .449 4. Albuquerque, NM..... .426 5. Grand Junction, CO.. .389 Runs scored ----------- 1. Henderson, NV....... 66 2. Chico, CA........... 47 3. League City, TX..... 44 4. St. George, UT...... 40 5. Albuquerque, NM..... 25 Hits ---- 1. Henderson, NV....... 77 2. St. George, UT...... 63 3. Chico, CA........... 61 4. League City, TX..... 50 5. Tucson, AZ.......... 33 Runs batted in -------------- 1. Henderson, NV....... 52 2. League City, TX..... 42 3. Chico, CA........... 39 4. St. George, UT...... 37 5. Albuquerque, NM..... 25 Doubles ------- 1. League City, TX..... 16 2. Chico, CA........... 15 3. Henderson, NV....... 13 4. St. George, UT...... 9 5. Tucson, AZ.......... 8 Triples ------- 1. Henderson, NV....... 2 Albuquerque, NM..... 2 Tucson, AZ.......... 2 St. George, UT...... 2 5. 3 tied at........... 1 Home runs --------- 1. League City, TX..... 6 2. Henderson, NV....... 5 3. St. George, UT...... 4 4. Tucson, AZ.......... 3 5. Albuquerque, NM..... 2 Total bases ----------- 1. Henderson, NV....... 109 2. St. George, UT...... 88 3. League City, TX..... 86 4. Chico, CA........... 81 5. Tucson, AZ.......... 54 Total plate appearances ----------------------- 1. Henderson, NV....... 245 2. St. George, UT...... 235 3. Chico, CA........... 200 4. League City, TX..... 156 5. Tucson, AZ.......... 127 At bats ------- 1. St. George, UT...... 206 2. Henderson, NV....... 195 3. Chico, CA........... 165 4. League City, TX..... 131 5. Tucson, AZ.......... 109 Walks ----- 1. Henderson, NV....... 31 2. St. George, UT...... 25 3. Chico, CA........... 21 4. League City, TX..... 17 5. Albuquerque, NM..... 16 Hit by pitch ------------ 1. Henderson, NV....... 9 2. Chico, CA........... 6 3. League City, TX..... 5 4. Albuquerque, NM..... 4 5. 2 tied at........... 2 Strikeouts ---------- 1. St. George, UT...... 40 2. Chico, CA........... 28 3. League City, TX..... 25 4. Henderson, NV....... 21 5. Eaglecrest, CO...... 17 Sac bunts --------- 1. Henderson, NV....... 7 2. Chico, CA........... 4 3. Tucson, AZ.......... 3 4. Albuquerque, NM..... 2 5. 2 tied at........... 1 Sac flies --------- 1. Chico, CA........... 4 2. Henderson, NV....... 3 3. League City, TX..... 2 4. 3 tied at........... 1 Stolen bases ------------ 1. St. George, UT...... 13 2. League City, TX..... 7 3. Chico, CA........... 5 4. Henderson, NV....... 3 Grand Junction, CO.. 3 Caught stealing --------------- 1. St. George, UT...... 5 2. League City, TX..... 1 Tucson, AZ.......... 1 Eaglecrest, CO...... 1 Steal attempts -------------- 1. St. George, UT...... 18 2. League City, TX..... 8 3. Chico, CA........... 5 4. 3 tied at........... 3 Grounded into DP ---------------- 1. League City, TX..... 5 Henderson, NV....... 5 3. Chico, CA........... 3 4. 3 tied at........... 2
The Automated ScoreBook Pitching Leaders (as of Aug 06, 2017) (All games) Hitting minimums - 1 Games 2.0 AB/Game Pitching minimums - 1 Games 1.0 IP/Game Earned run avg -------------- 1. Henderson, NV....... 2.60 2. St. George, UT...... 5.84 3. Albuquerque, NM..... 6.48 4. Chico, CA........... 6.87 5. Tucson, AZ.......... 7.92 Opposing bat avg ---------------- 1. Henderson, NV....... .243 2. Chico, CA........... .306 3. St. George, UT...... .328 4. Albuquerque, NM..... .333 5. Tucson, AZ.......... .343 Innings pitched --------------- 1. St. George, UT...... 49.1 2. Henderson, NV....... 45.0 3. Chico, CA........... 38.0 4. League City, TX..... 30.0 5. 2 tied at........... 25.0 Batters struck out ------------------ 1. Henderson, NV....... 45 2. Chico, CA........... 27 3. Albuquerque, NM..... 24 4. Tucson, AZ.......... 22 5. League City, TX..... 21 Batters SO out looking ---------------------- 1. Henderson, NV....... 16 2. League City, TX..... 10 3. Chico, CA........... 7 4. 3 tied at........... 6 Wins ---- 1. Henderson, NV....... 5 2. St. George, UT...... 3 3. League City, TX..... 2 Chico, CA........... 2 5. 2 tied at........... 1 Losses ------ 1. 7 tied at........... 2 Saves ----- 1. St. George, UT...... 1 League City, TX..... 1 Runners picked off ------------------ 1. Henderson, NV....... 3 2. Eaglecrest, CO...... 2 St. George, UT...... 2 4. Albuquerque, NM..... 1 Tucson, AZ.......... 1 Sac bunts allowed ----------------- 1. St. George, UT...... 10 2. Albuquerque, NM..... 2 League City, TX..... 2 4. 4 tied at........... 1 Sac flies allowed ----------------- 1. St. George, UT...... 4 2. Grand Junction, CO.. 3 3. Albuquerque, NM..... 2 4. 3 tied at........... 1 Hits allowed ------------ 1. Eaglecrest, CO...... 27 2. Tucson, AZ.......... 35 3. Albuquerque, NM..... 37 4. Henderson, NV....... 41 5. 2 tied at........... 48 Runs allowed ------------ 1. Henderson, NV....... 19 2. Eaglecrest, CO...... 22 3. Tucson, AZ.......... 23 4. Albuquerque, NM..... 27 5. Chico, CA........... 36 Earned runs allowed ------------------- 1. Henderson, NV....... 13 2. Albuquerque, NM..... 18 3. Eaglecrest, CO...... 20 4. Tucson, AZ.......... 22 5. Chico, CA........... 29 Walks allowed ------------- 1. Tucson, AZ.......... 11 Grand Junction, CO.. 11 3. Eaglecrest, CO...... 13 4. Albuquerque, NM..... 14 Henderson, NV....... 14 Doubles allowed --------------- 1. Chico, CA........... 5 2. Albuquerque, NM..... 6 Henderson, NV....... 6 4. Eaglecrest, CO...... 8 5. Tucson, AZ.......... 11 Triples allowed --------------- 1. Henderson, NV....... 0 League City, TX..... 0 3. Grand Junction, CO.. 1 St. George, UT...... 1 5. 3 tied at........... 2 Home runs allowed ----------------- 1. Albuquerque, NM..... 1 Tucson, AZ.......... 1 3. St. George, UT...... 2 Eaglecrest, CO...... 2 5. Henderson, NV....... 3 Wild pitches ------------ 1. St. George, UT...... 9 2. Grand Junction, CO.. 7 Albuquerque, NM..... 7 4. Chico, CA........... 6 5. League City, TX..... 5 Balks ----- 1. Albuquerque, NM..... 1 League City, TX..... 1 Hit batters ----------- 1. Grand Junction, CO.. 8 2. St. George, UT...... 7 3. 4 tied at........... 3 Intentional BB allowed ---------------------- 1. Albuquerque, NM..... 1 St. George, UT...... 1
The Automated ScoreBook Fielding Leaders (as of Aug 06, 2017) (All games) Hitting minimums - 1 Games Pitching minimums - 1 Games 1.0 IP/Game Fielding pct ------------ 1. Eaglecrest, CO...... .985 2. Henderson, NV....... .979 3. Tucson, AZ.......... .965 4. St. George, UT...... .961 5. Chico, CA........... .942 Chances ------- 1. St. George, UT...... 231 2. Henderson, NV....... 187 3. Chico, CA........... 172 4. League City, TX..... 132 5. Tucson, AZ.......... 114 Putouts ------- 1. St. George, UT...... 148 2. Henderson, NV....... 135 3. Chico, CA........... 114 4. League City, TX..... 90 5. 2 tied at........... 75 Assists ------- 1. St. George, UT...... 74 2. Henderson, NV....... 48 Chico, CA........... 48 4. Tucson, AZ.......... 35 5. League City, TX..... 32 Errors ------ 1. Chico, CA........... 10 League City, TX..... 10 3. St. George, UT...... 9 4. Grand Junction, CO.. 8 5. Albuquerque, NM..... 7 Fielding double plays --------------------- 1. St. George, UT...... 8 2. Chico, CA........... 5 3. Tucson, AZ.......... 4 4. League City, TX..... 3 5. 2 tied at........... 2 Stolen bases against -------------------- 1. League City, TX..... 8 2. Tucson, AZ.......... 7 3. Chico, CA........... 6 4. Albuquerque, NM..... 4 5. 3 tied at........... 3 Caught stealing by ------------------ 1. Chico, CA........... 3 2. Henderson, NV....... 2 3. Albuquerque, NM..... 1 St. George, UT...... 1 Tucson, AZ.......... 1 Steal attempts against ---------------------- 1. Chico, CA........... 9 2. League City, TX..... 8 Tucson, AZ.......... 8 4. Henderson, NV....... 5 Albuquerque, NM..... 5 Passed balls ------------ 1. League City, TX..... 3 2. Albuquerque, NM..... 2 Catchers interference ---------------------