Updates on VA's Electronic Health Record

Updates on VA's Electronic Health Record
Robert Jesse, VA’s principal deputy under secretary of health, spoke during the Legion’s Veterans Affairs & Rehabilitation Commission meeting on Aug. 25 in Indianapolis. (Photo by Eldon Lindsay)

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) updated The American Legion on the progress being made in creating its Electronic Health Record  (EHR) and improving its appointment scheduling.

Robert Jesse, VA’s principal deputy under secretary of health, gave the update during the Legion’s Veterans Affairs & Rehabilitation Commission meeting on Aug. 25 in Indianapolis.

Referring to VA and Department of Defense (DoD) health record systems, Jesse said, “The problem is our records don’t talk to their records.” Both systems are “prohibitively expensive to operate” and Congress has mandated that both departments must  work together more effectively  to implement a common health record system — EHR — scheduled to become operational in 2017.

“Part of the problem in health care is that there are so many ways to say the same thing,” Jesse said. EHR will help everyone in the VA/DoD health-care community to “speak the same language.”

A VA medical center in Chicago has been serving as a test bed for EHR, which will incorporate plug-and-play technology and mobile applications. Electronic medical records will not be housed in the system, but in an external “data lair.” Protection and security will still be top priorities in protecting the privacy of patients, Jesse explained, but they must be balanced with accessibility. Eventually, servicemembers and veterans will be able to track their medical records directly.

“In the long run, patients need to own their health records,” Jesse said. To make that happen, VA needs to develop a record system flexible enough to adopt new technologies as they emerge. “Right now, we have 12-year-olds who can write their own apps for their iPhones,” and VA needs to prepare the kind of electronic environment that will make today’s tech-savvy youth comfortable as health-care professionals.

VA’s current system for scheduling patient appointments, Jesse said, is 25 years old and the department has had issues recently with inordinate delays in scheduling appointments — especially in the area of mental health care. Modern scheduling packages are quite different and Jesse said VA is moving forward to take advantage of them.

“Scheduling a surgery is a lot like scheduling a flight mission from a carrier deck,” Jesse said, and VA’s current package is simply not meeting its needs. The department eventually wants to develop a system that would allow veterans to manage, cancel and reschedule their own appointments, and coordinate them between different provider locations.

“We want to develop an appointment scheduling system that is easy, intuitive and reliable,” Jesse said.

More in National Convention

 

Bob95490

August 25, 2012 - 6:29pm

Where to begin; well, let's see, due to be operational by 2017 while the current (2012) systems are unable to communicate with each other and neither system "speaks" the same language even though both are supposed to be practicing medicine begs questioning. Why, if both the VA and the Department of Defense are practicing medicine, are there language problems in describing medical problems and necessary treatment for these problems? Medical professionals are all University/College educated using the same medical / diagnostic language; why should there be a disconnect in medical and diagnostic language between different government agencies assigned to deal with medicine? Next, while there certainly are 12-year olds that can write apps for an iPhone it seems overly optimistic to believe that two governmental medical administration departments that don't speak the same medical language, let alone use the same forms, programs or thresholds for delivering treatment and/or compensation will be able to successfully complete total system integration in ten years, let alone the five remaining years available for complete integration. (Irony mode on: That is unless both departments are considering violating child labor laws and putting 12-year olds in charge of the transition; and while this might not be an entirely bad idea it would still be illegal. Irony mode off.) I question whether it is the 25 year old scheduling system that is to blame for scheduling delays or if it is the apparent total lack of preparation by the last two administrations to fund and plan for the obvious increase in patient load two wars and several ongoing overt and covert hostile military operations would produce. This funding and planning should have been an integral part of strategic planning and implementation. While the system for appointment and surgical scheduling would still require technological upgrading proper planning for the obvious increases that would be needed would have allowed that upgrading to take place in a manner other than crisis mode. Robert Ireland (PUFL)

Add new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Tell us what you think