Google +LinkedInPinterestYouTubeInstagramTwitterFacebook

The same standards for everyone

Featured in National Security
The same standards for everyone
U.S. Air Force photo

The American Legion believes that the U.S. Armed Forces are comprised of the most professional and effective military personnel in the world. At the very least, maintaining the current physical and mental requirements and qualifications for acceptance into military service is crucial. Additionally, physical and mental standards must be developed so as to insure a single duty-specific standard, regardless of gender or age, depending on Military Occupational Specialty.

The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 mandated the creation of the Military Leadership Diversity Commission (MLDC); the commission’s report was delivered to President Barack Obama on March 15 of this year. One of its recommendations is the elimination of the “Combat Exclusion Policies for women” including the removal of barriers and inconsistencies, to create a level playing field for all who are qualified.

American Legion Resolution No. 21, passed during the Spring National Executive Committee meetings this week, opposes the position that a level playing field is justification for this recommendation. The American Legion’s position is that favoring any segment of the force simply to increase the percentage of  promotions for that segment is absolutely wrong. The resolution – “Uniform Standards for Combat Military Occupational Specialties” – in part reads, “The American Legion believes that without such strong oversight by Congress of the physical and mental requirements, there exists the possibility of incremental changes that would reduce the physical and mental qualifications and requirements for the sake of accommodating personnel for ‘social experiments,’ and would have a detrimental or a disastrous effect on the combat effectiveness of our nation’s Army and Marine Combat Arms, Special Forces and Navy Seals.”

The resolution cites the significant roles and contributions that women serving in the U.S. military have demonstrated, and that the more than 213,000 women serving on active duty and 71,182 in the National Guard and reserves all are “serving with distinction and valor.” It is also noted that women veterans have been eligible for membership in The American Legion since the organization’s founding – a year before Congress passed what later became the 19th Amendment, which prohibited state and federal agencies from gender-based restrictions on voting.

Also noted in Resolution 21:

  • Women currently are excluded from serving in Combat Arms Military Occupational Specialties in the Army, Marines and Navy Seals, where close combat, high-intensity engagements with the enemy on a daily basis are expected.
  • The combat exclusion clause is based in large part on the 1992 findings of the Presidential Commission on the Assignment of Women in the Military, based on the physical requirements of service in combat situations.
  • Women are serving in Iraq and Afghanistan in low-intensity combat situations, and in truck convoys, military police units, female engagement teams and in Afghan villages, interacting and assisting Afghan women.
  • Any member of the U.S. Armed Forces serving in Iraq and Afghanistan are on a battlefield with a constantly changing definition and no truly secure areas.

Last May during its NEC Meetings, The American Legion passed a resolution that supports the removal of gender-based restrictions as long as the requirements for combat duty – or any other Military Occupational Specialty – are not compromised.

More in National Security

 

Fellows

June 30, 2011 - 2:14am

Some of these 'old white guys drinking clubs' need an attitude adjustment! Go talk to the Grunts, the real grunts, the guys who sling lead everyday for 6,7,12,15 months ask them what they think about lowering standards for a social science project. I think the Legion is right in advocating for those guys since they operate a little further from the political hatchet then those still in uniform. If you meet standards not a problem, if standards change for political reasons do you want to tell someones folks "hey sorry yeah he didn't make because she couldn't hack the weight, we knew it the whole time but it's this new policy couldn't do anything about it"

Humanstructions

November 26, 2013 - 2:13pm

You want a CIB Club or a 'I'm a 11B ... Whoopee ... I kill people' ..... Everybody cariies their load in a combat zone and even in peacetime everyone has a specific job to complete the mission ... I don't care if you were slinging hash or tracking mortars and rockets on radar like I was ... you got blood on your hands ... even the cooks that feed the Infantryman are part of the well-oiled machine ... Some Legion Posts act more like 'Block Clubs' and some of the key people involved are not even eligible Veterans! If we don't embrace the Active Duty and the recently returned Veterans then some of those 'Old White Boy Drinking Clubs' will wither and die eventually while perpetuating a stereotype.

RightGunner

May 12, 2011 - 9:02pm

The President does not own the photo it belongs in the National Archive. It does not have to go public immediately, a reasonable time should be set, announced and made official. What the Commander could ask of the Administration so that all of us would be better informed about our Government, is who are the non-military persons that have been or are being allowed to see the picture before it goes public. That should be a legitimate freedom of information request.

vetcounselor

May 10, 2011 - 11:21am

Some old timers in the AL think 'whites are better than blacks', 'men are better than women' ... granted, some gals might not cut out for 'hand to hand combat' but hey' 'if you're qualified ... you're qualified'! Some of these 'old white guys drinking clubs' need an attitude adjustment!

Bob95490

May 6, 2011 - 9:48pm

All military personel, male or female, serving in a combat area are subject to all the rigors and dangers of being in combat. Equal training requirements and standards will equal better prepared troops and result in a better chance of survival for all members of an engaged unit.

arod

May 6, 2011 - 3:26pm

If you show Bin Laden's photo then show all the photo's of all the people that were killed by Bin Laden. Oh, you don't think so?... Secondly, what do you think will happen after you show this picture of Al-Qaida's fallen leader? Maybe they'll get a little upset and mad and retaliate? You think? Guess who will be attacked first? Did you say America? Wrong answer. Does "STATIONED SOLDIERS AROUND THE WORLD" mean anything to you? Like in Iraq or Afganistan to name a couple? All due respect Commander Foster, we all know that the photos are paid for by us, the taxpayers, but... "FOR THE TROOPS."

Add new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Tell us what you think